
Trial Subject Zero
By Sabyasachi Roy
What if healing our emotional wounds means losing a part of what makes us human?
They didn’t choose him because he was brave. Or lonely. Or desperate for money, though the money helped. They chose him because he averaged out: statistically representative.
​
He was a thirty-eight-year-old man. An office job that never quite followed him home. Divorced, but amicable, in the way that means both people got tired at the same time. One sister. No kids. History of mild concussion, somewhere around. Allergies: seasonal. Normal sleep, normal anger, normal regrets.
​
Normal enough to be invisible.
​
This was Trial Subject Zero. He signed the consent forms with a pen that kept skipping. He joked about it, said even the pen was nervous. Nobody laughed, but they smiled. Polite smiles. Lab smiles.
​
The drug didn’t erase memory. That was the selling point. It softened reconsolidation, dulled the emotional spike when a memory was revisited. Trauma, but without the echo chamber. Same facts. Less punch.
​
“Like turning down the gain,” the lead researcher said, tapping the side of her head.
​
He nodded. He pictured a volume knob. He liked knobs. You knew where you stood with knobs.
He took one capsule every morning. Clear gel. No taste. He kept a log. Sleep quality. Mood. Dreams, if any.
​
Day three: slept fine. Dreamed of nothing.
​
Day seven: still fine. The dreams were gone. He wrote that down twice, then crossed one out, worried it sounded dramatic.
They brought him in for guided recall. Small room. Chair bolted to the floor. A screen. It showed old photographs. His mother, father, some school friends. The car accident, minor, but loud, metal arguing with itself.
​
He waited for the familiar chest-tightening. The heat behind the eyes. It didn’t come.
He described the scenes calmly. Details intact. Colors accurate.
The clinician asked, “How does that make you feel?”
He thought about it. “Like I’m cheating,” he said. Then shrugged. “But also… lighter.”
​
They noted that down.
​
At home, small things started slipping. He forgot to flinch when the elevator dropped a fraction of an inch. A loud bang outside didn’t spike his pulse. He watched a sad movie and admired the lighting.
​
His sister called. She was upset about work. The trial subject listened, said the right words, but his voice came out even. Flat in a way that wasn’t cold, just… level.
​
“You okay?” she asked.
“Yeah,” he said. And it was true.
​
Week three, the researchers gathered around a graph that made them quiet. His stress markers were down across the board. Cortisol curves smoothed. Heart-rate variability settled into something textbook-perfect.
​
“This is better than expected,” someone said.
​
They ran more recall sessions. Childhood embarrassments. Teenage heartbreaks. The trial subject talked about them like anecdotes from someone else’s life. He laughed once, surprised by himself.
​
At night, he cleaned. Not obsessively. Just steadily. Cupboards organized. Socks paired. He slept eight hours, woke without the usual static.
​
He stopped replaying arguments in the shower. Stopped drafting imaginary emails he’d never send. His mind felt roomy.
The first hint something was off came from the social battery test. They sat him in a room with three strangers and recorded micro-expressions. Normally, people showed flickers: tension, relief, anticipation. The trial subject showed courtesy. Interest. But no residue.
​
“He’s not bonding,” a junior researcher said.
“He’s polite,” the lead said. “That counts.”
They argued. Quietly. The word baseline floated around like a ghost.
He noticed people leaning away from him. Just a bit. Conversations ended sooner. A date he’d gone on twice said, gently, that he felt “very put-together,” which she said like it was a problem.
“Did I do something?” he asked.
“No,” she said. “You didn’t.”
​
That stuck with him.
Week six, they compared the trial subject’s data to population averages. That’s when the problem showed its teeth.
​
His emotional responses weren’t blunted below normal. They were below average. By a margin that made the algorithm itch. He wasn’t anxious enough. Didn’t ruminate enough. Didn’t spike where the curve expected spikes.
​
The model flagged him as anomalous.
He had become an outlier.
​
“What if this is what healthy looks like?” someone asked, half-joking.
​
The room didn’t laugh.
​
They pulled older data. Decades of surveys. Sleep studies. Stress tests. The curves shifted depending on era. People used to worry less about certain things. More about others. The definition of normal wobbled with time.
​
He came in for his checkup and found the mood different. Too careful. Too many glances.
​
“Am I okay?” he asked.
The lead researcher hesitated. “You’re… stable.”
“That’s not an answer.”
She sighed. “You’re doing very well. Better than our models predicted.”
“So I broke it.”
“You revealed it,” she said.
They stopped the drug.
​
The effects didn’t snap back. Some things crept in—irritation at traffic, a flicker of dread when bills arrived—but not all the way. The volume knob didn’t return to its old position.
​
He felt grief, eventually. His father’s face came back with weight. But it arrived late, like a train that missed its slot.
The researchers debated publishing. The ethics board circled words. Enhancement. Suppression. Identity.
​
He went back to work. People adjusted. Some liked the steadiness. Some didn’t. His sister said he seemed calmer. Then, after a pause, said she missed his rants.
​
“Sorry,” he said, meaning it.
“You don’t sound sorry,” she said.
​
He tried. It didn’t help.
​
Months later, the paper came out. Dry title. No names in the abstract. A footnote about redefining control groups.
He read it online, sitting on his couch, socks mismatched again. He recognized himself only in the graphs.
​
He thought about how much of his life had been shaped by tiny hurts he’d never named. The little jolts that kept him in line. Made him apologize first. Made him stay.
​
He wondered if those were flaws, or scaffolding.
Outside, a siren passed. He noticed it. He didn’t flinch.
​
He turned off the screen and sat there, feeling something like peace, and something like loss, and not knowing which one he was supposed to want.

Sabyasachi Roy is the author of Writing While the World Burns and Micro Craft for Sentences that Sing, e-books on the craft of writing published by Authors Publish. His poems have appeared in Stand, Poetry Salzburg Review, Singapore Unbound, The Wise Owl, and others. His fiction has been published in Viridine Literary, Inglenook Lit, After the Storm, among several journals. He writes craft essays regularly for Authors Publish.